Re: OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1
Date
Msg-id CAFaPBrQGCN9tOHo14c+BZY76a8i3R0_Z45+hDGDcZOxkg8-BxA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to OOM Killer / PG9 / RHEL 6.1  (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:42, David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> just a quick check, is
> vm.overcommit_memory = 2
> vm.swappiness = 0
>
> Still the way to go with PG9.0 / RHEL 6.1 (64bit) ?

IMHO yes (although I never touch swappiness...)

> I know we gained some control over the OOM Killer in newer kernels
> and remember reading that maybe postgres could handle it in a different way now.

If you compile with -DOOM_ADJ (which I think the red hat rpms do?)
yes. As usual the docs are fairly good:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adam Cornett
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.1 replication on different arch
Next
From: Roger Niederland
Date:
Subject: variable not found in subplan target list