Re: 024_add_drop_pub.pl might fail due to deadlock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 1:13 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, that makes sense to me. For HEAD and PG18, we can still add a new
> argument to the API. For other bank branches, it is better to use a
> new Ex function as suggested by Kuroda-San.
>

Here are the updated patches.

I have added "Ex functions" for back branches (PG_17 and earlier) ,
which also have Asserts for making sure locks are taken. For PG_18 and
HEAD, I've used the extra parameter already_locked.
PG_14_15-v6-0001-Fix-a-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION.-DROP-PU.patch
is for both PG_14 and PG_15 and
PG_18_HEAD-v6-0001-Fix-a-possible-deadlock-during-ALTER-SUBSCRIPTION
is for both PG_18 and HEAD.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia