On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:41 PM David Rowley <
dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't really share Laurenz's worry [2] about compatibility break
> from renaming this GUC. I think the legitimate usages of this setting
> are probably far more rare than the illegitimate ones. I'm not overly
> concerned about renaming if it helps stop people from making this
> mistake. I believe the current name is just too conveniently named and
> that users are likely just to incorrectly assume it does exactly what
> they want because what else could it possibly do?!
>
> I think something like debug_parallel_query is much less likely to be misused.
+1 on both points.
--
John Naylor
EDB:
http://www.enterprisedb.com
