On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:11 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 15 Sep 2022 22:38:01 +0800, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote in
> >
> > Hi hacker,
> >
> > Recently, I find there might be a typo in xact.c comments. The comments
> > say "PG_PROC", however, it actually means "PGPROC" structure. Since we
> > have pg_proc catalog, and use PG_PROC to reference the catalog [1], so,
> > we should use PGPROC to reference the structure. Any thoughts?
> >
> > [1] src/include/nodes/primnodes.h
>
> The patch seems to me covering all occurances of PG_PROC as PGPROC.
+1 since this hinders grep-ability.
> I found several uses of PG_PROC as (pg_catalog.)pg_proc, which is
> quite confusing, too..
It's pretty obvious to me what that refers to in primnodes.h, although
the capitalization of (some, but not all) catalog names in comments in
that file is a bit strange. Maybe not worth changing there.
--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
