Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsEu2gC_iQWKvm_gErZk6uOEGAcuryiFrQq2R0Vmjp8Sow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > (Starting a new thread for greater visibility)
> > The attached is a fairly straightforward correction. I did want to make
> > sure it was okay to bump the catversion in the PG14 branch also. I've seen
> > fixes where doing that during beta was in question.
>
> Yeah, you need to bump catversion.

Done, thanks for confirming.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: CFM for september commitfest