Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable
Date
Msg-id 1966418.1630436829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> (Starting a new thread for greater visibility)
> The attached is a fairly straightforward correction. I did want to make
> sure it was okay to bump the catversion in the PG14 branch also. I've seen
> fixes where doing that during beta was in question.

Yeah, you need to bump catversion.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: RFC: Improve CPU cache locality of syscache searches
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: mark the timestamptz variant of date_bin() as stable