Re: i.e. and e.g. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: i.e. and e.g.
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsEg6LLAu1U0Mxh0TyYqg7STqAwPRgkpeVdD+Ys2_rbhgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: i.e. and e.g.  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: i.e. and e.g.
List pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 3:40 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, I forgot about back-branches. Don't we need to fix the
> same in back-branches?

The intent of the messages is pretty clear to me, so I don't really see a need to change back branches. It does make sense for v15, though, and I just forgot to consider that.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom tuplesorts for extensions