Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Pól Ua Laoínecháin
Subject Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?
Date
Msg-id CAF4RT5SrOLpb+Em6egU+MVo4HDru5jaMDm8VwMrdGd56aAA_BQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?  (Vijaykumar Jain <vijaykumarjain.github@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Vijay, and thanks for your input.

> This wiki page.
> It has PR references for mysql and mongo for the fsycnc issue.
> Fsync Errors - PostgreSQL wiki


OK - so that shows that it did affect MySQL and MongoDB... I'm
surprised that there wasn't more of a brouhaha over it so - what with
MySQL being so prevalent - there appears to have been more coverage of
the issue on the PostgreSQL side - even given that it was first
spotted by PG developers.


> I'd leave the more intellectual brainstorming to the experts.

Indeed - some of those dev list conversations can be very involved...

Rgs,


Pól...

> Vijay



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Hans Buschmann
Date:
Subject: AW: Huge performance penalty with parallel queries in Windows x64 v. Linux x64
Next
From: Pól Ua Laoínecháin
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL, Asynchronous I/O, Buffered I/O and why did fsync-gate not affect Oracle or MySQL?