Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Geoff Winkless
Subject Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Date
Msg-id CAEzk6ffcSHXsqmA91aMZd2GfN-A6y3WJttw7naXU_U+qZhKstg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
List pgsql-hackers
On 8 June 2015 at 17:03, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
It's not about the 5 minutes of compile time, it's about the signalling.

Just *when* is git ready for testing? You don't know from the outside.

I do lurk here a lot and still am unsure quite often.

Even simply releasing an alpha *tarball* would be useful enough. What
is needed is the signal to test, rather than a fully-built package.

​I can see that, and can absolutely get behind the idea of a nightly being flagged as an alpha, since it should involve next to no developer time.

I may be overestimating the amount of time that goes towards producing a release; the fact that the full-on alpha releases were stopped did imply to me that it's not insignificant.

Geoff​

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode