Re: Why we lost Uber as a user - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Geoff Winkless
Subject Re: Why we lost Uber as a user
Date
Msg-id CAEzk6fenkdBOLnc4rZPo+Q2sgcRWDEo08qKdBvc-V8Rvw9fnEA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly.burovoy@gmail.com>)
Re: Why we lost Uber as a user  (pgwhatever <michael@sqlexec.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 27 July 2016 at 17:04, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Well, their big complaint about binary replication is that a bug can
spread from a master to all slaves, which doesn't happen with statement
level replication.  

​I'm not sure that that makes sense to me. If there's a database bug that occurs when you run a statement on the master, it seems there's a decent chance that that same bug is going to occur when you run the same statement on the slave.

Obviously it depends on the type of bug and how identical the slave is, but statement-level replication certainly doesn't preclude such a bug from propagating.​
 

​Geoff​

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade: exit_hook_registered variable
Next
From: Vitaly Burovoy
Date:
Subject: Re: Why we lost Uber as a user