On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 4:08 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 09:47, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vignesh,
> > Thanks for the patches.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 2, 2025 at 7:10 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > The backport seems to be straight forward. Please let me know if you
> > > > need my help in doing so, if we decide to backport the fix.
> > >
> > > Now that this has been reported on the back branches, we should
> > > consider whether it's appropriate to backport the fix. Here are the
> > > patches prepared for the back branches.
> >
> > PG14 and + patches do not test that DROP PUBLICATION does not disrupt
> > the publication. I think we need to test that as well.
>
> Currently, the test across all branches except PG13 is the same test
> used in the master branch. For PG13, since there was no existing
> subscription, I modified the test slightly to accommodate that. If I
> handle the comment you suggest, the test in master and the backbranch
> will be different. Should we keep the test similar to the master or is
> it ok to address your above comment and keep it different?
IMO we should modify the test on master as well and either backpatch
both commits or backpatch after combining those two commits.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
