Re: PGDG status and policy - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Steve Crawford
Subject Re: PGDG status and policy
Date
Msg-id CAEfWYyyRekiY16xFjOBGDhdP_QtsP+rd71UrupHy8uX5SJCGrw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGDG status and policy  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
List pgsql-general


On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:34 AM Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 10/18/18 3:36 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> No, the *link* exists. The package doesn't (404 errors on, for example,
> Centos 7 x86_64 and several others).

According to this:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/04a8f81ad82d272d031f43c9f6f742e2fd3fcd30.camel%40gunduz.org

it should be fixed now. A quick check seems to indicate it is.


It is. Thanks. (I actually checked and discovered it was fixed, downloaded and installed on two servers by the time the message came through.)

Cheers,
Steve
 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 11 and security
Next
From: Kevin Brannen
Date:
Subject: RE: pg_dump backup utility is taking more time around 24hrs to takethe backup of 28GB