Re: Covering GiST indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Covering GiST indexes
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=33fU9o7YCwtEH2QCYdQRUf0V7R6hsLgHs1X69rr4ykRQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Covering GiST indexes  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: Covering GiST indexes
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> Here is v3 version of the patch. I've fixed some comments and added some words to docs.

Hi again Andrey,

Cfbot reported the following difference (twice) in the
index_including_gist test:

- ERROR: included columns must not intersect with key columns
+ ERROR: relation "tbl_gist_idx" already exists

Well, both of those errors are valid complaints in this case... maybe
the order of checks changed in master since you wrote the patch?
Probably better to use a different name for the index anyway.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept