Re: Suspicious call of initial_cost_hashjoin() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
>> Does this look right to you?
>
> Yes, this is what I meant. The patch applies cleanly and the code compiles
> well.
>
>> If so, can you sign up as a reviewer and mark it Ready for Committer?
>
> Done.

Thanks.

> Actually I think it'd be nice if the "parallel_hash" argument was mentioned in
> the header comment of initial_cost_hashjoin() function, but not sure this is
> worth returning the patch to the author.

Done.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com