Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=1XLoaipM5d7QTeWJ7XP3SnNhwmJMwjAab8G0srkrdB2Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the review.  New version of patch #1 attached.

Here's a version rebased on top of the recently reindented master branch.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table