Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operationson the same table
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0q6WMEsbcafVQHJjFjr7AV6AmDH4a9Z8mrqZGg7C7D0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>
>  Thomas> Thanks both for the review.  New version of patch #2 attached.
>
> I'm looking to commit this soon; if anyone has any further comment now
> would be a good time to speak up.

Here's patch #2 rebased for the recent reindent.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT