Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=10kGC15gVz0xd=EQF3EGf6+ymD57byi2DDTv4GvAEj6A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Measuring replay lag  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:03 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> So perhaps I should get rid of that replication_lag_sample_interval
> GUC and send back apply timestamps frequently, as you were saying.  It
> would add up to a third more replies.

Oops, of course I meant to say up to 50% more replies...

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Artur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscription
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Microvacuum support for Hash Index