Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0NmVG=z-8XLeHxQwWYDa3kyUodb5XCJQKZ5CKgwK19oQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SERIALIZABLE with parallel query  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Haribabu Kommi
<kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to
> test the serialize parallel query.
>
> Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite
> or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch
> into "ready for committer" state.

Thank you!  I will try to find a good benchmark that will really
exercise parallel query + SSI.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status
Next
From: Kuntal Ghosh
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scan vs BTP_DELETED and BTP_HALF_DEAD