Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCW4cs6+u50a6ro5ACt1OddLi-KXmJoPp0C7HWqJj+bfnQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2 November 2015 at 09:10, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think we should avoid using ONLY or VALUE within the names since those
> already have other meanings in Postgres.
>

We already have window functions called first_value, last_value and
nth_value, so I think use of "value" in the name is OK (and
consistent). Actually thinking some more, I think the name
"unique_value" is better because it's more suggestive of the fact that
uniqueness is being enforced.

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)