Re: RLS restrictive hook policies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: RLS restrictive hook policies
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCVtjvRmxWCNCvkwzKPqLebnyGAw6A18Jdh26rwc-U9+5g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RLS restrictive hook policies  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: RLS restrictive hook policies  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3 August 2015 at 16:09, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Dean, all,
>
> * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
>> Agreed.  I'm happy to commit that change and back-patch it to 9.5,
>> barring objections.  Given that the only way to have restrictive
>> policies currently is using hooks, I don't believe there's any
>> documentation update required either; of course, I'll update the comment
>> to reflect this discussion/decision and make any necessary changes to
>> test_rls_hooks.
>
> Patch attached to make this change, with appropriate comment updates and
> fixes to the test_rls_hooks modules.
>
> Comments?
>

Looks good to me.

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: RLS restrictive hook policies
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Microvacuum for gist.