Re: Bug in MERGE's test for tables with rules - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Bug in MERGE's test for tables with rules
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCVso98Fp=JhW22iw+5zXP008y7YbaoakNhC3mCcrrEMNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in MERGE's test for tables with rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 at 15:32, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Not quite sure the added test case is worth the cycles.
>

No, probably not, for such a trivial change.

Pushed to HEAD and 15, without the test. Thanks for looking!

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Richard Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in row_number() optimization
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?