Re: Numeric x^y for negative x - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCVC19V6cSmYBQ-VGxa6JHedWWrUZpdA+DURCzhoHceM7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 21:26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested).
>
> > So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is,
> > is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases?
>
> I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member.
>
> Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in
> the real world, but we don't know that.
>

OK. Will do.

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Next
From: David Zhang
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug] Logical Decoding of relation rewrite with toast does not reset toast_hash