Re: Numeric x^y for negative x - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jaime Casanova
Subject Re: Numeric x^y for negative x
Date
Msg-id 20210901233917.GA10373@ahch-to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Numeric x^y for negative x  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 09:27:03PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 21:26, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> > > On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 17:15, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >> Looks plausible by eyeball (I've not tested).
> >
> > > So, I have back-branch patches for this ready to go. The question is,
> > > is it better to push now, or wait until after next week's releases?
> >
> > I'd push now, given we have a failing buildfarm member.
> >
> > Admittedly, there may be nobody else using that compiler out in
> > the real world, but we don't know that.
> >
> 
> OK. Will do.
> 

Hi Dean,

It seems you already committed this. But it's still as "Ready for
committer" in the commitfest app. 

Are we waiting for something else or we can mark it as committed?

-- 
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: psql tab auto-complete for CREATE PUBLICATION
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful