Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_Vj0hPM5-0Uto_L14OFVf2KbpTvEpDn4qxTEqoz+5kHSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Incorrect comment in heapam.c
List pgsql-bugs
On 20 December 2011 18:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>=
 wrote:
>>> In fact, that macro is defined in access/htup.h...should it be?
>
>> IMHO comment is wrong, code is in the right place.
>
> It used to be in heapam.h ... evidently, whoever moved it missed this
> comment.

I imagined that that was the case.

It's a fairly inconsequential bug, but it is worth fixing...

--=20
Peter Geoghegan =A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Martin Pitt
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Use CC atomic builtins as a fallback
Next
From: "Andrea Grassi"
Date:
Subject: R: R: R: R: R: BUG #6342: libpq blocks forever in "poll" function