Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_URfq8yVScaZY2KtVap9=jw_zFMeZXMMswBDY9MoRU99Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 8 March 2012 13:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then again, considering that gettimeofday is kinda
> expensive, I suppose that would have to be optional if we were to have
> it at all.

+1. I'm not opposed to having such a mechanism, but it really ought to
impose exactly no overhead on the common case where we don't
particularly care about plan time.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch
Next
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation