On Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:37 AM Fabien COELHO wrote: >> If we had a different set of tests, that would be a valid argument. But >> we don't, so it's not. And nobody has offered to write a feature to >> split our tests either.
- There is a certain value in having separate tests, just that for the big-tests to be any meaningful, if the buildfarm could run on a periodic (daily?) basis and send some kind of automated bug-reports. Without an automatic feedback, most may not inclined to run all tests before submitting a patch and there'd be a big pile up near a release.
- For now, the new tests that I submit for review (for next CF) would be for 'make check', until a 'make bigcheck' or whatever is up and running.
