Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Sharma
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date
Msg-id CAE9k0PkpOJkPXWrv_dqu_fhjw4+XW=weN_6kyUZXXZw0rxGRdQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 04:41, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Okay. As suggested by Alexander, I have changed the order of reading and
>> doing initdb for each pgbench run. With these changes, I got following
>> results at 300 scale factor with 8GB of shared buffer.
>
>
> Would you be able to test my patch also please?
>

Sure, I can do that and share the results by early next week. Thanks.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Poor memory context performance in large hash joins
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)