On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 9:06 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com> writes:
>> Currently, table_privileges view in information_schema.sql doesn't
>> show privileges on materialized views for currently enabled roles. As
>> per the documentation-[1], it should be showing the all privileges
>> granted on tables and views (the documentation doesn't says it has to
>> be normal view). Shouldn't we allow it to show privileges on
>> materialized views as well.
>
> The spec is quite clear that rows in table_privileges must correspond
> to rows in information_schema.tables, but we don't show materialized
> views there.
>
> Perhaps there's a case for showing MVs in the "tables" view, and thence
> also in table_privileges, but this patch by itself is flat wrong.
>
Okay. But I couldn't find any such case for showing MVs in "tables" or
"table_privileges" view. In fact, I could see some more views under
information_schema that doesn't consider MVs, For e.g.
column_privileges.
> Anyway it seems to me we made that decision already; it's a bit late now
> to be revisiting whether MVs should be treated as tables here.
>
Okay. However, I feel, if normal view can be treated as tables then
MVs could also be. Thanks,
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma
EnterpriseDB:http://www.enterprisedb.com
