Re: Error-safe user functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Corey Huinker
Subject Re: Error-safe user functions
Date
Msg-id CADkLM=ft22BXpt5snfKSUq5uzX-wEVZLpUvEFDmf2_xXb7qtbQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 9:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the design is evolving in your head as you think about this
> more, which is totally understandable and actually very good. However,
> this is also why I think that you should produce the patch you
> actually want instead of letting other people repeatedly submit
> patches and then complain that they weren't what you had in mind.

OK, Corey hasn't said anything, so I will have a look at this over
the weekend.

                        regards, tom lane

Sorry, had several life issues intervene. Glancing over what was discussed because it seems pretty similar to what I had in mind. Will respond back in detail shortly.
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Failed Assert in pgstat_assoc_relation
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert