Re: Error-safe user functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Error-safe user functions
Date
Msg-id 1925585.1669990324@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error-safe user functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Error-safe user functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: Error-safe user functions  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> I think the design is evolving in your head as you think about this
> more, which is totally understandable and actually very good. However,
> this is also why I think that you should produce the patch you
> actually want instead of letting other people repeatedly submit
> patches and then complain that they weren't what you had in mind.

OK, Corey hasn't said anything, so I will have a look at this over
the weekend.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Israel Barth Rubio
Date:
Subject: Re: Add support for DEFAULT specification in COPY FROM
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump: Remove "blob" terminology