2015-11-22 23:54 GMT+01:00 Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>:What about pg_size_unpretty()? I was going to suggest pg_size_ugly(), but unpretty does emphasize the inverse (rather than opposite) nature of the function."unpretty", "ugly" aren't good namesmaybe pg_size_bytes or different approachwe can introduce data type - bytesize - default input/output is human readable text - and conversion to bigint is implicitSome likeselect .. where pg_table_size(oid) > bytesize '3.5GB'and instead pg_size_pretty(pg_table_size(oid)) we can write pg_table_size(oid)::bytesizeRegardsPavel
What about pg_size_unpretty()? I was going to suggest pg_size_ugly(), but unpretty does emphasize the inverse (rather than opposite) nature of the function.
What about pg_size_unpretty()?
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных