On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
On 07/18/2015 01:32 AM, Corey Huinker wrote:
So this patch would result in less C code while still adding 3 new functions. Can anyone think of why that wouldn't be the best way to go?
Let's pursue the "CAST(srf() AS row_rtype)" syntax that Joe suggested upthread (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/559A9643.9070409@joeconway.com). For some reason, the discussion went on around the details of the submitted patch after that, even though everyone seemed to prefer the CAST() syntax.
- Heikki
I'm all for adding that syntax, but it wouldn't be useful for my purposes unless row_rtype could be a variable, and my understanding is that it can't.
