On 07/18/2015 01:32 AM, Corey Huinker wrote:
> So this patch would result in less C code while still adding 3 new
> functions. Can anyone think of why that wouldn't be the best way to go?
Let's pursue the "CAST(srf() AS row_rtype)" syntax that Joe suggested
upthread
(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/559A9643.9070409@joeconway.com).
For some reason, the discussion went on around the details of the
submitted patch after that, even though everyone seemed to prefer the
CAST() syntax.
- Heikki
