Re: LWLocks in DSM memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mithun Cy
Subject Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Date
Msg-id CAD__OuicnfXA7cAv9BrkcFSTNOM-vJZaG-Xh1oK03SHG-OY5rA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLocks in DSM memory  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>Can you specify the m/c details as Andres wants tests to be conducted on some high socket m/c?

As I have specified at the last line of my mail it is a 8 socket intel machine.

available: 8 nodes (0-7)
node 0 cpus: 0 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103
node 0 size: 65498 MB
node 0 free: 50308 MB
node 1 cpus: 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111
node 1 size: 65536 MB
node 1 free: 44594 MB
node 2 cpus: 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
node 2 size: 65536 MB
node 2 free: 61814 MB
node 3 cpus: 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
node 3 size: 65536 MB
node 3 free: 55258 MB
node 4 cpus: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
node 4 size: 65536 MB
node 4 free: 46705 MB
node 5 cpus: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
node 5 size: 65536 MB
node 5 free: 40948 MB
node 6 cpus: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
node 6 size: 65536 MB
node 6 free: 47468 MB
node 7 cpus: 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
node 7 size: 65536 MB
node 7 free: 17285 MB
 


--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?