Re: LWLocks in DSM memory - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Khd-rcVvmzfnrepntTfZH2Zh2oE8q6KzDao0pAfqFGqA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: LWLocks in DSM memory  (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: LWLocks in DSM memory  (Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Mithun Cy <mithun.cy@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>Yes. I want a long wait list, modified in bulk - which should be the
>case with the above.

I ran some pgbench. And, I do not see much difference in performance, small variance in perf can be attributed to variance in probability of drawing the particular built-in script.


Can you specify the m/c details as Andres wants tests to be conducted on some high socket m/c?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mithun Cy
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Next
From: Mithun Cy
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory