If repmgr is not PG version dependant, it should all go into the same directory, on the other hand if it is version dependant, I would add the version of postgres to the package name.
Strahinja Kustudić| Lead System Engineer | Nordeus
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Devrim Gündüz <devrim@gunduz.org> wrote:
Hi, On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:47 +0200, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> I am working on improving repmgr packaging. Do we need separate repmgr > versions for separate PG versions? Right now, we don't have separate > package for 9.3, and 9.4 for example. Is that an issue?
Tired me -- I meant to say:
* Right now, we don't have PostgreSQL version number in the package, but we install them under PostgreSQL directory /usr/pgsql-9.X/... . Either we will install the binaries and libs under /usr/bin and /usr/sbin and /usr/lib(64), or leave the files as where they are now and add PG version number to the package name.
Regards,
-- Devrim GÜNDÜZ Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
