On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I'd suggest we either name it based on the current tentative
>>> date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
>>> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it
>>> more clear.
>>
>> +1 to both names suggested by Magnus.
>
> We do need to pick one of them :)
>
> Anybody else with preferences?
I would prefer to see a consistent namimg pattern (i.e., 2016-09)
and rename it if we reschedule.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
