Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Date
Msg-id CABUevEwLhGwzVqtx72-0xpR+cCTMjOo8dJochiU+QRESOz7K4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I guess that commit fest 2016-03 is going to begin soon, at which
> > point nobody will be able to add new patches because
> > 1) already closed CF don't accept them.
> > 2) A CF currently running neither.
> > I propose to create an extra CF, called "Future" or similar where
> > people will be able to park the patches submitted for the 9.7 cycle.
> > This will be renamed later on as the first CF of 9.7 once the
> > development schedule for 9.7 is decided.
>
> Yeah, we can do that. I'd suggest we either name it based on the current
> tentative date for CF1 (september), or name it specificaly "9.7-first" or
> something like that rather than just plain "future", to make it more clear.

+1 to both names suggested by Magnus.


We do need to pick one of them :)

Anybody else with preferences?
 
--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: Addition of extra commit fest entry to park future patches