Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id CACjxUsMk=ecHt2mKXGb-bRJHFgzPgAGRz+5GyUhAPdBp568j0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It seems pretty clear to me that this is busted.
>>
>> I don't think you actually tested anything that is dependent on any
>> of my patches there.
>
> I was testing which rows show up in a transition table, so I assumed
> that was related to the transition tables patch.  Note that this is
> not about which triggers are fired, just about how inheritance
> interacts with transition tables.

Yeah, I got confused a bit there, comparing to the updateable views case.

-- 
Kevin Grittner
VMware vCenter Server
https://www.vmware.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PQhost may return socket dir for network connection
Next
From: Pierre Ducroquet
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug with pg_basebackup and 'shared' tablespace