Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY63i_8mpKUbxpi_k2VB9c+bRtOUow8QPcB4yXFYzq4Aw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] transition table behavior with inheritance appearsbroken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems pretty clear to me that this is busted.
>
> I don't think you actually tested anything that is dependent on any
> of my patches there.

I was testing which rows show up in a transition table, so I assumed
that was related to the transition tables patch.  Note that this is
not about which triggers are fired, just about how inheritance
interacts with transition tables.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes