Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Date
Msg-id CACPNZCstUFYx-dSGodtxbozo0S9MrrNhjVS_AT7YXiXyc3ZA3Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> [patch to shrink oid index]

It would help maintaining its newfound sveltness if we warned if a
higher oid was assigned, as in the attached. I used 6200 as a soft
limit, but that could be anything similiar.

-- 
John Naylor                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)