Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nisha Moond
Subject Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Date
Msg-id CABdArM51Fvq_=cVkvdiRO05j6z5rFvtZkc-W=Wn0tjEy1W9Ozg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 12:22 PM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 3:31 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Please find the attached v46 patch having changes for the above review
> > comments and your test review comments and Shveta's review comments.
> >
>
> Thanks for addressing comments.
>
> Is there a reason that we don't support this invalidation on hot
> standby for non-synced slots? Shouldn't we support this time-based
> invalidation there too just like other invalidations?
>

I don’t see any reason to *not* support this invalidation on hot
standby for non-synced slots. Therefore, I’ve added the same in v48.

--
Thanks,
Nisha



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: logical replication: restart_lsn can go backwards (and more), seems broken since 9.4