On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:35, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Note that the progress indicator will *always* count wrong when you
>> choose to include WAL, since we just don't know how much WAL there
>> should be. I guess in this case we could just advance the "end
>> counter" as well as we go, making sure it doesn't shoot above 100%.
>>
>> Does that seem reasonable?
>
> Yes. If you're interested into the progress being made and the goal is
> moving, it's better to know about that.
Done and applied.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
