Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Note that the progress indicator will *always* count wrong when you
> choose to include WAL, since we just don't know how much WAL there
> should be. I guess in this case we could just advance the "end
> counter" as well as we go, making sure it doesn't shoot above 100%.
>
> Does that seem reasonable?
Yes. If you're interested into the progress being made and the goal is
moving, it's better to know about that.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
