Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
Date
Msg-id CABUevEzWD0vpG+2tQbCSfbCeW_VkGMJ4ABPDTN=PkuLdvJwyyw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?  (Kris Pennella <kris@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
List pgsql-advocacy
We are fairly restrictive about giving access to that data. You'd have
to check that with -core.

Through a quick discussion with Jonathan yesterday it seems the data
in there isn't actually that correct anyway - it looks like we're
hitting the limit of what the free tier of google analytics will give
us, and have been hitting that for quite some time, so we don't really
know what the numbers are...

But it might be a good idea to have somebody who actually knows how GA
works very well take a look at things and see if we can work something
out from it.

//Magnus


On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Kris Pennella <kris@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Magnus -
> If you'd be willing to get me access to the google analytics, I'd be willing
> to cull through them and do some analysis. I think any of the data found
> would be useful to the group at large (thoughts of what everyone would like
> to see, what's important would be helpful/encouraged).
> I've noticed in doing the analytics analysis for 2Q that many pages under
> postgres.org/  drive a decent percentage traffic to our site and it varies
> slightly from month to month which pages are most popular.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Kris Pennella     2ndQuadrant US
> Operations/Client Services  kris@2ndQuadrant.com
>  503.236.8196
> PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
>
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 7:25 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Jonathan S. Katz
> <jonathan.katz@excoventures.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2012, at 6:26 AM, damien clochard wrote:
>>
>> > http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=postgres%2C++oracle&l=&relative=1
>> >
>> > http://markmail.blogspot.fr/2008/02/postgresql-more-traffic-than-mysql-and.html
>> >
>> > Any other ideas ?
>>
>> It would be good to see the trend of website views.  Regardless of how
>> people download Postgres, at some point they do need to come to the site,
>> e.g. for documentation or community support, etc.  It would be good to see
>> the trendline for website growth, not only as a metric of more Postgres
>> "awareness" but we can also break down the results further and analyze what
>> people are actually looking at on the website.
>
>
> Probably a fair amount of people actually never go even to the website.
>
> We do have google analytics data for quite a few years around somewhere. It
> will only track those people who don't block google analytics of course,
> which we're probably quite overrepresented when it comes to, but it's
> something.
>
>
> --
>  Magnus Hagander
>  Me: http://www.hagander.net/
>  Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
>



--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Kris Pennella
Date:
Subject: Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?