On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> Certainly sounds like a very similar problem. If so, the query is
>> simply buggy - it's just that a pg_upgrade'd environment is *much*
>> more likely to run into the problem than before.
>>
>> I only checked the usages of pg_shdescription. The same bug might well
>> exist with almost all uses of pg_description.
>
> OK, here's a patch that should fix this, as well as Magnus' previous
> fix which doesn't appear to have been tested so well :-p
I think I'll have a hard time denying that, yes :)
> Magnus; can you give it at least an eyeball review before I commit
> please, in case there are any thinkos in there.
So you trust my review now, even though I messed up my own one? ;)
But yeah, looks ok from a quick eye-over.
--Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
