<p dir="ltr"><br /> On Feb 5, 2013 5:34 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" <<a
href="mailto:andrew@dunslane.net">andrew@dunslane.net</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> ><br /> > On 02/01/2013
08:55AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:<br /> >><br /> >><br /> >> On 02/01/2013 06:12 AM, Craig Ringer
wrote:<br/> >>><br /> >>> On 01/26/2013 10:56 PM, Noah Misch wrote:<br /> >>>><br />
>>>>On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:<br /> >>>>><br />
>>>>>Just to confirm, I think that this is ready for commit as posted in<br /> >>>>> <a
href="mailto:20130101025421.GA17763@tornado.leadboat.com">20130101025421.GA17763@tornado.leadboat.com</a>.<br/>
>>>>><br/> >>>>> I'll amend my docs changes and submit them separately.<br />
>>>><br/> >>>> Thanks. Here's a rebased version.<br /> >>><br /> >>> Is
thereany chance someone could pick this up for 9.3 before it diverges too much? It's ready to go, Windows only, and
tested.<br/> >>><br /> >>> <a
href="https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1023">https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1023</a><br
/>>>><br /> >>><br /> >><br /> >><br /> >><br /> >> I expect to get to it in
duecourse if nobody else does. I have been set back some by the death and replacement of my Windows workstation, (plus
comingto terms with Windows 8).<br /> >><br /> >><br /> ><br /> ><br /> > OK, I have looked at
thisand it seems perfectly sane. In fact, after a very frustrating time VS2012 is the *only* way I have found to get a
64bit build using MS tools on Windows 8. Given that, I propose to backport these changes to 9.2 so we can get some
buildfarmcoverage of that tool chain that includes the latest stable release.<br /><p dir="ltr">As long as it's fairly
standaloneand doesn't change the actual cost around (mobile atm so i couldn't look at the actual patch), that seems
likethe right idea to me. <p dir="ltr">/Magnus
