Re: Online checksums patch - once again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyTp8OKUxV+-id0PLoB0sA+7d2uefAzYnq=Kb03V5r5PQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums patch - once again  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Online checksums patch - once again
List pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:48 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 2019-Aug-26, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> OK, let's try this again :)
>
> This is work mainly based in the first version of the online checksums
> patch, but based on top of Andres WIP patchset for global barriers (
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20181030051643.elbxjww5jjgnjaxg%40alap3.anarazel.de
> )
>
> Andres patch has been enhanced with wait events per
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEwy4LUFqePC5YzanwtzyDDpYvgrj6R5WNznwrO5ouVg1w%40mail.gmail.com
> .

Travis says your SGML doesn't compile (maybe you just forgot to "git
add" and edit allfiles.sgml?):

Nope, even easier -- the reference pgVerifyChecksums was renamed to pgChecksums and for some reason we missed that in the merge.

I've rebased again on top of todays master, but that was the only change I had to make.
 

Other than bots, this patch doesn't seem to have attracted any reviewers
this time around.  Perhaps you need to bribe someone?  (Maybe "how sad
your committer SSH key stopped working" would do?)

Hmm. I don't think that's a bribe, that's a threat. However, maybe it will work.
 
--
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow to create partitioned tables
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys