Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02
Date
Msg-id CABUevEyMhkXP46JU3-9V7yqZ=yyGi7PhM3k43G6jWPW6CY98-g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Moving on to close the current CF 2015-02
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> @Magnus: having the possibility to mark a patch as "returned with
> feedback" without bumping it to the next CF automatically would be
> cool to being moving on.
Meh. "cool to have to help moving on".


Yeah, it's at the top of my list of priorities once I get some time to spend on community stuff. Hopefully I can get around to it next week. There is a small chance I can do it before then, but it is indeed small... 

My apologies for that being delayed even longe rthan that. I've finally pushed the changes that:

* Renames the current "returned with feedback" to "moved to next cf"
* Adds a new status, "returned with feedback", that is the same as "rejected" in everything except the label (meaning it closes the patch out, but does *not* move it to the next CF).

This was at least my understanding of the consensus :) 


--

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept