On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
On 03/22/2016 09:10 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > While having parallelism is awesome, it's only going to affect a > (arguably small or big depending on your viewpoint) subset of users. > It's going to be massive for those users, but it's not going to be > useful for anywhere near as many users as streaming replication+hot > standby+pg_upgrade in 9.0, or pitr+windows in 8.0. And yes, the vacuum > freeze thing is also going to be great - for a small subset of users > (yes, those users are in a lot of pain now). > > > I had a discussion with Marko T just a couple of weeks back, and the > conclusion then was that at the time, 9.6 had almost nothing that would > even make the cut for a press release. We now have these two features, > which are great features, but I'm not sure it's enough for such a big > symbolical bump.
